A ranking that might really matter

This week, the Chronicle of Higher Education reported that aerospace giant Boeing is poised to enter the college rankings business. According to the (password-protected) Chronicle report, “The Chicago-based aerospace giant has spent the past year matching internal data from employee evaluations with information about the colleges its engineers attended. It has used that analysis to create a ranking system, which it plans to unveil in the coming month, that will show which colleges have produced the workers it considers most valuable.”

With a 160,000-person work force that includes 35,000 engineers worldwide, Boeing may make a mark where the government and others have not — raising the possibility that employers could become a major force for college accountability.

“We want to have more than just subjective information” for evaluating the colleges that Boeing visits to recruit and hire, said Richard D. Stephens, the company’s senior vice president for human resources and administration. “We want to have some concrete facts and data.”

Boeing plans to keep the rankings confidential, much to the chagrin of college administrators who hope their institutions make the top grades. “Self-promotion is especially likely because some lesser-known institutions will be revealed as having done an ‘excellent’ job of producing high-performing Boeing engineers, Mr. [Richard D.] Stephens [Boeing’s senior VP for HR and administration] said, without identifying any such colleges ahead of their expected notification.”

It will be interesting to see how this plays. For a school like ours, with a heavy emphasis on engineering, a good grade from a company like Boeing would be well worth trumpeting. Verification of our programs from a major employer of our graduates would carry a lot of weight with the parents of prospective students, especially in these tough economic times. But there’s always a down side to playing the rankings game. No matter whose doing the ranking, there’s always a chance that you won’t make the grade next year.

Advertisements

Author: andrewcareaga

Higher ed PR and marketing guy. Communications director for Missouri University of Science and Technology (Missouri S&T) in Rolla, Missouri, USA. Slow runner, mediocre guitarist, lover of music and puns, and an avid St. Louis Cardinals fan. I blog and Tweet about #highered, #music, #gocards and #random stuff.

2 thoughts on “A ranking that might really matter”

  1. How do they plan to go beyond subjective information? Beyond that, how can you judge an entire institution on the merits or demerits of one or two graduates?

    I’d like to see them rank the recruitment experience. Would they evaluate how lavish the dinner for recruiters before the college’s job fair? Will they measure traffic to their table at the fair, demonstrated interest, shall we say? Customer service from the career center?

    I worked with Dr. Amjad Ayoubi, career center guru now at Tulane, formerly at Oklahoma State and he always championed customer service within the university setting, operating just like private sector recruiting companies, showing the reps a great time while they were on campus, and yes, serving surf and turf.

    [WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us ‘487201018 which is not a hashcash value.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s