Missouri S&T colleague Terry Barner produced a wonderful year-end video recap for our campus. It’s built on one-second clips from academic days of the calendar year, beginning in January 2016 and concluding with our December commencement ceremonies. View the video above or click here to watch.
Yes, the headline is a bit on the clickbait side, but you really should watch this video.
As we in the U.S. take a long Labor Day weekend to celebrate the American worker, it’s a good time for those of us who work in the marketing field to acknowledge the contributions of fellow workers outside our field to the overall marketing and brand experience of our organizations. Continue reading “Marketing: Not just for marketers”
According to a recent study by Socialbakers, video posts on Facebook now have the greatest reach of all types of posts. (And photos, once considered the best way to reach audiences on that social media platform, are eating video’s dust.)
So if you’re already annoyed by the number of videos cropping up in your Facebook timeline, brace yourselves. More video is coming. And marketers, obedient lemmings that we are, will quickly run to Facebook as the platform for sharing video.
What does this mean for YouTube?
Despite Facebook’s recent claim that it is the platform where the majority of videos are shared, this post makes a good argument in favor of YouTube reigning supreme in the online video world for some time to come. YouTube is the No. 2 search engine (after Google), its videos can be shared across many social platforms and it gives video uploaders a cut of ad revenue — all proof that YouTube is not dead yet.
Still, it will be interesting to see how the rise of video on Facebook will challenge YouTube and other more established platforms.
How is your organization using Facebook for video?
Facebook “like” image via PRDaily
Wednesday, March 13, 2013: The video of our discussion is now available.
Thursday, March 7, 2012: Thanks to everyone who tuned in today! Hope you had as much fun as I did. If you missed today’s show, check the Higher Ed Live website or YouTube channel in a few days for the archive.
I’m excited to be part of a roundtable discussion about branding in higher education on this week’s edition of Higher Ed Live, the weekly live webcast about issues in higher education.
This episode airs at a special time — earlier than usual, at 11 a.m. EST Thursday, March 7 — and features two past winners of Educational Marketing Group‘s International Brand Master Award: 2011 recipient Emma Leech, director of marketing and communications at Nottingham University in the UK, and me. (I won the award in 2009). Our discussion will be moderated by Travis Brock, director of business development for Educational Marketing Group and one of the people who tweet from @EMGonline. (Travis also tweets from @tbrock111.)
I hope you’ll tune in and chime in on the #higheredlive back-channel on Twitter. With Emma’s participation, this will be a branding discussion with a truly international flavor — not only because she hails from the UK, but also because her team’s work extended beyond the UK to China and Malaysia.
What: Higher Ed Live Roundtable Discussion with Former Brand Masters
When: 11 a.m. EST Thursday, March 7
Where: On the Internet (watch live at higheredlive.com/live/)
Thursday’s episode will mark my third appearance on Higher Ed Live. In my first show, host Seth Odell and I talked about the future of PR in higher ed and a roundup of the CASE V/VI joint conference held in Chicago last December.
We all know how important it is to incorporate storytelling into our marketing efforts. We also know how, in the social media realm, storytelling and authenticity should complement one another to achieve marketing goals.
Authenticity hasn’t always been that important in traditional marketing. When we see an ad on TV or in a magazine, we’re not all that surprised when a brand incorporates a bit of fiction to sell their products.
But we do appreciate verisimilitude in those stories, right? When the fiction seems to be plausible and connects with us on some visceral level, that’s a winner. That’s why certain types of ad fiction work better than others. The ones that work best resonate with us because the story line is plausible. It’s a vignette that you could imagine actually happening to someone, somewhere. Or you can place yourself in the shoes of the protagonist. The story somehow feels right.
An example of a brand fiction that resonates with me is the Apple “rock god” commercial (video) that plays up the value of the iPhone 4’s voice-recognition assistant Siri. (Thanks to Siri, boy buys guitar, boy learns how to play “London Calling,” boy forms garage band and boy gets called “rock god” by Siri.) My inner teenager can relate to that dorky kid. I watch that clip and in my mind I ponder: Ah, if only the iPhone and Siri had been around when I was a teenage rock god wannabe. Where would I be today?
But sometimes storytelling can lead us down the slippery slope of “truthiness,” a term coined by Stephen Colbert way back in 2005 (video). This, I think, is more of a danger for brands that do much of their marketing in the realm of social media, where authenticity is seen as a virtue, if not a necessity.
The idea behind social media marketing is that it’s somehow more real than the dreck we get from all the other channels — that it’s more true.
Everybody knows the marketing piped to us via TV, radio, direct mail, and print advertising and that bastard child “advertorial” is fake. But social media is a way to shed ourselves of that disingenuous marketing fakery. In social media, we consumers are empowered to talk one-on-one with ourselves about the brands we love, and those we love to hate. And we can talk with the brands themselves.
I thought about these things — about authenticity, transparency and truthiness — after viewing a video by Hootsuite that is designed to help business people (especially bosses) learn about the value of social media in business. Different cuts of the video were posted on the Hootsuite blog under the title “Teaching Your Newbie Colleagues About Social Media.” It’s a well-produced video centered around a cafe that uses social media — and Hootsuite in particular — to connect with customers. Other characters include a cupcake-loving student who promotes the cafe’s product and a lending institution that helps the business owner with financing. It’s a nice story that may have been inspired by the work of another social media dashboard company.
After watching the video, I wanted to learn more about this cupcake cafe and its social media success. Seeing the company’s Twitter handle so prominently displayed in the video, I decided to click on over to @BreadNCoffee‘s Twitter profile, perhaps read some tweets.
There’s was just one problem. The Twitter feed was inactive.
Not only was @BreadNCoffee not following anyone (not even @Hootsuite), but the account also had <s>no</s> only 6 followers and had not yet tweeted. There was no contact information, either. No website, even.
Clearly, @BreadNCoffee is doing it wrong.*
Which means @Hootsuite is doing it wrong. It’s faked authenticity.
Hootsuite developed a nice story line, and I figured they apparently had the presence of mind to grab the @BreadNCoffee Twitter account early on in the process of fleshing out video concept (according to TwBirthday, @BreadNCoffee was born on May 23, 2012) but, judging merely from the presence of the Twitter account, the company appears to be a mere vehicle for Hootsuite’s marketing, just like Apple’s iPhone-wielding teenage rock god. The Hootsuite social media video is truthy. Too truthy for my tastes.
I would expect a company interested in promoting its services as a social media platform to have thought this through a bit more.
But maybe I’m overreacting. It seems many corporate brands don’t view authenticity as much more than a means to an end. This 2011 Forbes piece, “The Battle for Social Media Authenticity,” by Jennifer Leggio, puts the idea of authenticity from a corporate point of view in some perspective.
“Consider a corporate social media strategy meeting,” Leggio writes (deftly weaving some truthiness into her description of the corporate setting). “The team designated to determine social media strategies has a directive to use the tools and develop ideas that drive. The question then becomes, is it wrong for companies to want to build their businesses, market to their customers and use every trick of the social media trade to meet their corporate objectives? Easy answer is no but it’s more complex than that.”
The problem with this contrived approach is that customers are not connecting with brands merely to get deals. Most of the time they generally despise having marketing shoved in their faces. They connect because they want to see the human side of the business and feel like they are a true part of the brand, and that people behind the brand truly care about them. (Emphasis mine.)
I guess that’s what bugs me the most about how Hootsuite developed this ad campaign. I use Hootsuite for personal and professional social media management. Even though I know nothing about the people behind the company, I’ve always considered the service I use to be a product of a social media culture that values authenticity (even if they do tout the “scheduled tweets” function more than I prefer). I somehow feel hoodwinked by Hootsuite’s approach, which feels more truthy than authentic.
* Even though @BreadNCoffee is inactive on Twitter, the company does have a Facebook presence (with 10 fans at this writing) and is on Google Plus. The company is authentic, too. It is located in Nantucket, Mass.
Anyone who’s interested in the future of higher education ought to watch this video (also embedded below) of Mark Greenfield talking about the flattening of higher ed. The video is less than 10 minutes long and is well worth your investment of time.
This was Mark’s talk from the recent #140cuse conference presented by Syracuse University’s School of Information Studies. You can view all of the talks from that event on this YouTube channel.